Australian Islamist Monitor

Islam Under Scrutiny

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Terror Trial Twits

E-mail Print PDF
Tracee Hutchinson
Much nonsense was talked during the recent terror trial of the “Benbrika 12” (or maybe to give them due respect, the “Magnificent 12”).  In this short article, I can only hope to list a few items. Readers might like to add their favourite “terror tosh” in the comments section.

1.  Tracee Hutchison was indignant that “talking about committing an unspecified violent act actually constitutes a breach of Australian law.” Funny, I can’t remember her expressing similar outrage when the Two Dannies endured years of legal proceedings for simply talking (accurately) about what was in the Qur’an.
 
“After 482 bugged conversations and thousands of hours of telephone taps and video surveillance, all the prosecution could present to the court was talk. Big talk. Chilling, some of it. But it was, in the end, just that - talk.

There was no evidence of any specific target — only the testimony of a witness even the judge described as unreliable and who was being treated for a mental illness at the time he testified that the Grand Prix and the AFL grand final were part of a terror plot.

…history will record that Benbrika was engaged in an organised campaign to commit violent jihad in Australia and enlisted a group of young Muslim men to help carry out the plan. The actual plan was never, and never had to be proved, such is the wording of the Howard government's amended terror laws that refer only to proving the existence of a terror act.
The seven convicted members of a terror organisation might as well be known as Benbrika's Brigade. It wasn't al-Qaeda or the Taliban. The terror-related items several were convicted of possessing weren't fertiliser or explosives — they were DVDs of beheadings and DIY terrorism handbooks. Not nice, but illegal? Apparently now in Australia it is.

Bongiorno In the police recordings, Benbrika does talk with a chilling desire to inflict maximum damage in the course of dying for jihad and talk of killing John Howard and killing 1000 to make the Australian Government pull the troops out of Iraq.

But as I sat in court during Justice Bongiorno's summing up I had to really ask myself what the 12 men in the dock had actually done. Plotted. Talked. Watched some videos and read some terrorist handbooks. Rebirthed a few stolen cars to fund their unspecified plans.

Perhaps these men really were on a path of violent jihad. Or perhaps they were just disenchanted Muslim men reacting with misguided empowerment to the prevailing anti-Muslim sentiment whipped up by the Coalition of the Willing at the time… what we are left to contemplate has set a dangerous legal precedent about guilt before the law and where we have really landed in the so-called war on terror. (source)

2. Judge Bongiorno -  Karen Kissane, in the Age 18th September, in “Trial and Error”, noted that he

“shortened the jury’s sitting time by half an hour from Sept 1st to allow the defendants to make it back to jail in time for sunset during the fasting period of Ramadan.
He debated with lawyers how best to manage another court custom. In a Supreme Court trial, the court is ordered to stand for the entrance of the judge, and then the judge and those facing him bow to each other as a gesture of respect for their mutual roles and for the legal process. In this trial, the accused stayed seated during that little ritual.
Bongiorno
Supreme Court judge Bernard Bongiorno has been persuaded by SC (Senior Counsel) of the defendants, Jim Kennan and Mark Taft*, that the alleged terrorists are being treated inhumanely by the authorities and are at a state of mental collapse. 

A Muslim may bow to no one but Allah, the judge was told. This was confirmed by witness Samir Mohtadi, a Muslim community leader, in his evidence to the court: “It’s an act of worship. Shouldn’t be done even to a king or queen.”

There were many sharp exchanges over Corrections Victoria classifying the accused as high-risk. Corrections tried to insist on 26 security guards in court (the judge allowed only 12) and wanted the men to sit behind an existing perspex security screen in the dock. But at the request of defence lawyers, who argued the screen would prejudice the jury against the men because it suggested they were seen by authorities to be a danger to the community, the judge ordered it be taken down.”

Amazing how we suspend our own customs in order to defer to Islamic demands. Time was that if an accused refused to stand up, he was in contempt of court. But sharia obviously trumps Australian law. And heaven forbid anyone got the idea these jihadis were seen as a danger to the community!

3. Keith Moor prepared a special report - “Terror Down Under” – revealing his abysmal ignorance of Islam.Keith Moor

“Benbrika was able to twist Muslim literature to extol the virtues of being a suicide bomber… tempting Merhi with was the promise of juicy rewards awaiting him in paradise if he became a martyr in Allah's cause.

Benbrika's interpretation of Muslim religious documents was that if Merhi killed himself while committing a terrorist act, he would receive the seven special things Allah supposedly gives to martyrs and no one else… including 72 virgin women in paradise, 70 members of his family would be guaranteed access to paradise, a special crown and garment in paradise so all would recognise him as a martyr, his soul would be kept in the bodies of the green birds that fly around paradise.
“Muslim religious documents and literature” - would that be the Qur’an and hadiths, which are the basis of Islam? As for twisting, just as a corkscrew is not a twisted version of anything, neither is Islam. There is simply no untwisted Islam!

Police secretly taped Benbrika telling Merhi that the rulings of Allah meant it was permissible to carry out violent acts of jihad in Australia, as Allah permitted violent jihad against countries which were considered a land of war and that Australia was a land of war because it had sent troops to Iraq in support of the US.

Benbrika told his followers not to believe moderate Muslims when they taught that the word jihad had many meanings, not all of them violent.

''They say jihad means many things. He's a donkey. He doesn't understand his religion,''
Allah he mentioned the jihad in the Koran. What does it mean? It's fighting the unbelievers, that's all. And the kuffar (unbelievers) ... this word, they know what this word means. It means we want to kill them.''
Samir MohtadiBenbrika met and befriended Samir Mohtadi, who told police he drifted away from Benbrika because of his fundamentalist Islamic views. Benbrika used his classes as a recruiting ground for radicals and chose likely candidates to attend more secretive meetings to discuss an extreme form of Islam - a form which most Muslims despise and reject.

Is Keith claiming Muslims despise and reject the core beliefs of their own faith? Where is his evidence? Surveys overseas have consistently shown that a significant proportion of Muslims support Sharia and an Islamic state in the Western country in which they live, and the goals and methods of Islamist terrorists. Any Muslim or non-Muslim who criticises Islam is threatened by other Muslims or murdered, as well as being denigrated by our media and academia and labelled racist/ Islamophobic.

Muslims who do reject Islam often live in hiding, in fear of their lives, as Islam mandates death for apostasy. Moderates who stay and try to reform Islam are also threatened and have no power or influence.

They were also taught why, in Benbrika's warped view of Islam, Muslims were expected to take part in violent jihad - including jihad on Australia.

Benbrika's warped interpretation of Allah's wishes included permission for his followers to steal cars, commit fraud, become suicide bombers, kill innocent women and children and generally wage war on Australia in Australia.
“Ok by Allah because stealing to fund terrorism was approved by the exalted one”.

Benbrika’s view is not warped. Muslims are expected to wage permanent Jihad, and they can kill, steal, rape and loot for this purpose, just as Mohammad did, as the Qur’an mandates, and as Muslims have behaved for 1300 years.

Bassam Raad's barrister, Benjamin Lindner, told the jury his client was:
a ''naughty boy'' who was involved in credit card fraud and other ''naughty'' things…Though he was never a terrorist… he made threats but didn't carry through with them…'When he says he's going to shoot someone, don't take him literally and don't take him seriously…His actions speak louder than his intemperate and hot-headed words.'' (source)

So stealing and threats of violent jihad are just being naughty? That’s OK then. Let’s send them to bed without supper!
 
4. Christine Nixon , Vic Police chief.Christine Nixon

 “It is a fair description to say Benbrika preyed on the vulnerability of young men, under the cloak of religion, as a means to extol his own extremist version of Islam

Extremists use various tools to exert a considerable amount of influence including advice provided under the guise of religion, which includes the promise of paradise maidens."
Description it might be, but not a fair one. Islam is extremist. Islam is an ideology hiding under a cloak of religion via taqiyaa, used to hide the hideous reality of Islam.

5. Mick Keelty Australian Federal Police Commissioner.
Dhimmwit2 - Keelty
 “This is one of the things our counter-radicalisation strategies are trying to defeat. We now know a lot more about radicalisation and how it works around the world…
That’s why the broader Australian community does not condemn the entire Muslim community for the actions of a few”.
How few would that be, Mr. Keelty? Almost half of UK Muslim males 15 to 35 support jihad, sharia, an Islamic state and the goals and methods of terrorists. And where is the entire Muslim community’s protest at Islamic violence?

6. The Prosecution

In “A Jihadist and His Disciples”, (see later) Karen Kissane noted:
Benbrika was an absolutist and a perfectionist, passionate about his own interpretation of Islamic belief (the prosecution was at pains to point out that it did not suggest for a moment that Benbrika represented the true face of Islam).
Of course not! The true face of Islam is kind and friendly - that’s why it wants us dead!!

So much for the twits’ words of wisdom. Now let’s hear it from those who know.

1. The Mufti of Australia, Sheikh Fehmi Naji El-Imam
"The Islamic community is relieved that this legal process has now come to some conclusion," the sheikh said.
"Although we were not present throughout this lengthy trial, we are confident that the accused were given the opportunity to present their innocence.
"The reaction from the Muslim community to the verdicts is one of mixed emotions, as many people know of these men and empathise with the hardship that their families have endured to date and will continue to endure beyond today."  (source)
Fehmi

Extraordinary words!! In case you missed it, Fehmi is declaring their INNOCENCE, which under sharia they are, as it is licit to steal, lie and commit violence against the infidel.

And why mixed emotions? Surely if Muslims are loyal citizens, they should empathise with fellow Aussies, who have endured hardship because of Islam, not with the perpetrators?

Just whose side is Fehmi on?

2. Islamic Council of Victoria
Mark Colvin said back in 2005, when news of the arrests broke, the ICV feared a backlash, and that their community would be further tarred with the terrorism brush, but they are happy with the way the judicial process unfolded.

Malcolm Thomas, ICV:
“justice has been served, as Justice Bongiorno stressed to the jury that the trial was about the activities of the men and that Islam was not on trial.
JEFF WATERS: But surely you can't be happy that six members of your Islamic community have been found guilty of terrorism?
Does it not trouble you that these men are Muslim?

MALCOLM THOMAS: It troubles us that by association people will think that Muslims are prone to violence and acts of terrorism. That's a perception which is brought about obviously by cases like this and activities overseas.

JEFF WATERS: So how do you explain cases like this then?

Aly, Soliman & Thomas
Aly, Soliman and Malcolm Thomas 

MALCOLM THOMAS: I can't explain cases like this. Only to say that these people have done actions which is not in accordance with what we believe our religion tells us.

JEFF WATERS: Malcolm Thomas says conditions in the community have changed since the convicted men first came together, an assertion Waleed Ali agrees with.

WALEED ALI: Well one of the things that's changed, perhaps paradoxically enough, is this trial. I mean the fact that this trial happened, that they were arrested, I think it changed the shape of the issue. And to a lot of people who may have been on the edge of radicalisation I think it probably did send some kind of message to them that the authorities were being vigilant, and so it may have caused some in that sort of position to back off.

But also I think don't underestimate the impact of the Mohammed Haneef saga, which did a couple of things; one, it really did expose the limitations and the potential shortcomings of anti-terrorism laws in this country and their application. But it changed the nature of the national security conversation around terrorism and suddenly I think the public became a lot more sceptical of the way the government was riffing on terrorism as an issue.

And that in turn changed the social environment. So discussions of terrorism were not as heated and really frenetic as they were previously. And it lowered the social temperature a little bit which is kind of an odd outcome. (source)

Yes Malcolm, unsurprisingly people do think that Muslims are prone to violence and acts of terrorism, a perception reinforced by Islamic words and activities here and overseas.

Waleed, ever eager to project blame away from Islam, tries to insinuate the Mohammed Haneef case illustrated the government were manipulating the terrorism laws for their own purposes, increasing public scepticism of our anti-terrorism efforts. Certainly, this was the rhetoric of Islamists and their far-left supporters, but it is not supported by the evidence.

3. Samir Mohtadi

"I said if he intends to kill anyone in this country, he will imprison our Muslim sisters, basically, and he would be killing innocent people and … it will be devastating for the Muslim communitWright-Neville y and the non-Muslim community."
So the reason for Mohtadi’s concern is that Benbrika would make it hard for Muslim women and the Muslim community. And then, as an afterthought, for us infidels as well!

4. Professor David Wright-Neville , co-founder of the Global Terrorism Research Centre at Monash University, giving evidence at the plea hearing last year for Atik, who pleaded guilty to terror charges, argued that religion was not a causal factor but could help hold a group together:
"Religion becomes a way that the political entrepreneur can manipulate (and) instil a common ideology." (source)
So Prof, the terror has nothing to do with Islam? Nothing to do with what the Qur’an says?
Well, that’s a relief!!

I can sleep easy in my bed tonight, knowing that someone of your calibre is lecturing on global terrorism at one of our top universities!

 

Last Updated on Sunday, 28 September 2008 04:23  

AIM Listed by NLA

pandora

Australian Islamist Monitor's web publications were selected for preservation by the National Library of Australia. Access to our materials stored in the NLA Archive is facilitated in two ways: via the Library’s online catalogue; and via subject and title lists maintained on the PANDORA home page.
Click HERE for direct access to the archive

Islam Kills

History - Articles

Lest We Forget the Battle of Tours

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Violent Jihad

Australians celebrate and revere Anzac Day on April 25th each year in remembrance of our brave soldiers who fought in two great world wars to secure our freedom. Every Australian identifies with the slogan “lest we forget” and in services held around the country people reflect on the battles and men who died to secure our freedom. Yet across the world in France, there is one remarkable battle which helped form the Europe we know today and allowed the development of civilization based on Judeo Christian principles. This one famous battle has become known as the battle of Tours and effectively stopped the Muslim advance into Europe. After the death of Mohammed in 632AD, Muslim armies exploded out of the Arabian peninsula to conquer much of the Middle East, expanding across north Africa. From there they crossed into Spain in 711AD and eventually controlled much of al-Andalus by 715AD. It was the victory at Tours by Charles Martel that stemmed the tide and eventually the Muslim marauders were expelled from Spain in 1492 when the last outpost at Granada fell to King Ferdinand of Spain. 

Read more

Shivaji’s Coronation Laudatory Landmark

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Infidels' Resistance

Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was born, lived, fought and won battles against religious and social oppression in the 17th century Bharat or India. He was a shining star in the Indian firmament and is renowned as a champion of the downtrodden and depressed masses. He was and continues to be an icon for the classes and masses alike and is seen as a rallying point for peasants oppressed by foreign rulers, Pathans and Moghuls alike. Sexually exploited women found in Shivaji Raje a protector, a benefactor and flocked to his Hindavi Swaraj to find solace and feel liberated under his saffron flag. 

Read more


Ransomer of Captives from the Muslims

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Tolerance Myths

Perhaps some readers might be interested to know that January 28 is considered a feast day among Catholics – actually 2 feast days are celebrated on the same day – one is of ST Thomas Aquinas, the great medieval theologian and philosopher who adapted Aristotle to the western Judeo-Christian worldview. . It is also the feast day of a lesser known person – St Peter Nolasco, the great ransomer of captives from the Muslims.

Read more


Islamic Pirates

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Violent Jihad

Barbary Corsair
Somalian Islamic Pirates & Lessons from History
 
The dramatic rescue of the American cargo-ship captain Richard Phillips from the hands of Somalian Islamic pirates by the U.S. Navy—killing three pirates, holding him hostage at gun-point, through precision-targeting—warrants a review of the U.S. struggle with piracy and hostage-taking in North Africa, which ended two centuries ago.

Raiding trade-caravans and hostage-taking for extracting ransom in Islam was started by Prophet Muhammad. Having become powerful and secure after his relocation to Medina from Mecca in 622, Muhammad initiated Jihad or holy war in the form of raids of trade-caravans for earning livelihood for his community. In the first successful raid of a Meccan caravan at Nakhla in December 623, his brigands killed one of the attendants, took two of them captive, and acquired the caravan as “sacred” booty. The captives were ransomed to generate further revenue. Muhammad, later on, expanded this mode of Jihad to raiding non-Muslim communities around Arabia—for capturing their homes, properties and livestock, capturing their women and children as slaves often for ransoming and selling, and imposing extortional taxes—which sometimes involved mass-slaughter of the attacked victims.

Read more


The Battle of Broken Hill

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

Battle of Broken Hill Logo
 
The First Islamic Terrorist Attack on Australian Soil
 
On January 1, 1915 two Broken Hill men, both former camel drivers, armed themselves with rifles, an homemade flag bearing Islamic insignia and a large supply of ammunition and launched a surprise attack on the Picnic Train about 3 kilometres outside Broken Hill.

The train carried about 1200 Broken Hill residents to Silverton where a picnic to celebrate the new year was to take place.

The two Muslim men, Gool Mohamed originally a Pashtun tribesman from Afghanistan and Mullah Abdullah from what is known today as Pakistan, decided to wage jihad against Australian infidels after Australia and the Ottoman Empire officially joined the opposite sides in the WWI.

Read more


Jihad Galore

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Tolerance Myths

Jihad Galore and the Toledo Whore

Battle of Higueruela

Alhambra - GazelleHow often in conversation with a Muslim, do they quote Spain as the crowning achievement of Islam, where Muslims, Jews and Christians lived in harmony for about 800 years?

And when you mention the killings and massacres, you are told that the Spanish Inquisition was much worse.
This is a misconception, since the Inquisition in Spain was responsible for only between 4,000 and 5,000 lives. [1]

Yet in 1066AD, in a single day, muslims murdered over 4,000 Jews because Vizier Joseph ibn Naghrela had risen to a position greater than them, and of course, this upset the Muslim sensitivities. [2]

Read more


Arabs Hated The Quran

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Stolen Heritage

 
How the Arabs Hated The Quran
 
Old Quran

Wh y are you a Muslim?
Musli ms in general love to hear the above question because it has a simple and readymade answer in their minds besides it gives them the opp or t u nity to propagate their religion and talk proudly about Islam.

 

Read more


Lepanto Anniversary

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Imperialism

Decisive Victory for the West

At this time of year, it is timely to remember one of the greatest victories of the west against the Islamic world. On the 7th October in 1571, Don Juan and the Holy League, led by Admiral Doria, defeated the larger Ottoman fleet in the Battle of Lepanto, saving Europe from the Turks and militant Islam. The Holy League was a coalition of different armies - of the Republic of Venice, the Papacy (under Pope Pius V), Spain (including Naples, Sicily and Sardinia), the Republic of Genoa, the Duchy of Savoy, the Knights Hospitaller and some others.

Read more


Muslim Jerusalem

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Stolen Heritage

Jerusalem - Coat of ArmsWhy do Muslims insist that Jerusalem is their Holy City?
When Mohamed and his faithful followers moved from Mecca to Medina, they found themselves among three Jewish tribes/clans (BANU-L-NADIR, BANU KAINUKA and BANU KURAIZA)  which settled there some time after their expulsion from their homeland and also living there were  two Arab, pagan tribes.

Mohammed, who at this stage needed more followers, decided to win those tribes over and convert them to his newly invented religion.

Islam was yet not as fully developed as we know it today, and Mohammed was still having his sessions with Allah (the Medina period revelations).

Read more


Killing of Banu Quraiza

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Imperialism

Did Prophet Muhammad order Killing Surrendered Jews of Banu Quraiza and Khaybar?  A historical Analysis

In the post 9/11 era of this modern-world, Islamists around the globe are busy with ‘damage control utopia’ in order to correct the image of religion Islam. We all know that the nucleus of Islam are: Quran, Hadiths (Sunnah) supported by Islamic histories and biographies recorded by various famous Islamic scholars and historians.

What Mecca?

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Early History

A great tragedy of the Islamic control of our universities and political correctness plus the fear of extreme violence if anyone dares question the roots and claims of Islam is ...that nobody dares question the roots and claims of Islam!!!  I want to stimulate interest and offer this summary of information on Mecca from (LINK) which discusses some problems with Muslim claims in a comparison of evidence supporting Islam/Christianity. 

Read more


Yahweh or Hubal

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

FlagThere is a very strongly entrenched view among majority of Westerners today that the three main monotheistic religions Judaism, Christianity and Islam share one common God and therefore despite the obvious differences, the core foundation of these three religions is the same. 

Read more